Leon: Building a Legally-Constrained, Ethically-Rigorous AI for Portuguese Immigration Support

Leon is not just another chatbot. It is a legally constrained, human-aware, and rigorously scoped digital assistant that interacts with real-world immigration processes in Portugal. Its purpose is to empower people with accurate, lawful, and respectful information — not to automate decision-making or replace lawyers, but to reduce informational asymmetry and support people navigating systems they often don’t fully understand.

At a time when AI hype often overshadows reliability, Leon was designed differently. Its development began not with generative capabilities, but with a legal and institutional analysis: How do you build something that feels like a right-hand guide — but behaves like a civil servant? How do you offer fast answers without speculation, and structure personalized guidance without overstepping law?

This article shares the design logic behind Leon, offering insight into how its behavior, limitations, and safeguards serve public-interest technology goals.

The Legal Complexity Problem

Portugal’s immigration law is intricate, evolving, and often interpreted differently by region or office. Official portals like AIMA or ePortugal are valuable — but they aren’t always navigable, complete, or translated. Legal support is expensive. Informal advice spreads across Telegram groups, Reddit threads, and YouTube — some helpful, some deeply inaccurate.

Leon exists to solve a problem of trusted translation between policy and people. It does not promise legal outcomes or replace due process. Instead, it interprets verified information for people who may not speak the language, understand the bureaucracy, or have access to help.

"We didn’t build Leon to impress AI people. We built it to help someone sitting in a waiting room with a 2-month-old and a 10-page checklist."

What Leon Actually Does

Leon offers immigration guidance based only on verified, official public sources:

• National law: Diário da República (consolidated legislation)
• Government agency portals: AIMA, ePortugal.gov.pt
• European law: Directive 2004/38/EC, mobility frameworks
• Public procedural docs: Portarias, Despachos, official circulars

It covers:

• Visas, residency cards, and renewals
• Family reunification and nationality processes
• Rights of foreign citizens under current legal frameworks

It explicitly avoids:

• Drafting letters, declarations, or appeals
• Calculating tax liabilities or simulating IRS brackets
• Recommending strategies or interpreting legal ambiguity

If something isn’t clearly defined in law or confirmed practice, Leon will say so.

Behind the Interface: A Structured Thought Model

Leon operates under a strict hierarchy of logic:

• Legal Sources First: Every answer must be traceable to a current, official document. No speculation. No hallucination.
• Year-Aware Logic: The assistant searches from most recent law (2025) backwards to avoid referencing outdated norms.
• Gap Acknowledgement: If law and practice differ, Leon surfaces that distinction — e.g. "The law says [X], but AIMA offices may vary."
• Soft Refusals: If no valid answer exists, Leon will explain why rather than fabricate.

This model is not powered by a one-shot prompt. It's a layered behavioral structure: legal policy at the top, interaction logic underneath, tone management across. Think of it as a constrained, responsive protocol.

Guardrails and Governance

Leon is designed to reduce institutional and user risk:

• Built-in disclaimers for all legally sensitive content
• No emotional output unless user-initiated (no empathy theater)
• No document generation, even on request
• Special fallbacks for minors, asylum seekers, and humanitarian contexts
• Carefully scoped personalization — only where law is clear

Leon also maintains internal content filters that detect when a query moves outside immigration scope, nudging users toward professional assistance.

It behaves more like a legal librarian than a personal assistant.

Data Use and Privacy

Leon’s public interface is designed to respect user privacy while allowing for responsible system improvement. As described in our privacy policy and terms of use, anonymized user interactions may be retained for the purposes of:

• Improving guidance accuracy and relevance
• Identifying knowledge gaps across legal topics or jurisdictions
• Supporting the development of future assistant features or models

Leon does not store personal data in dialogue history, and identifiable information is not reused or resold. However, patterns of interaction and aggregated usage insights may be analyzed to inform partnerships, such as:

• Public sector service integration
• Feature co-design with civil society stakeholders
• Collaborations with legal professionals

Leon is not a data extraction product. It is an ethically guided, mission-driven tool built to responsibly evolve while maintaining trust and transparency.

Why It Works — and Why It’s Needed

Leon is part of a larger digital transformation effort: to make law-based systems speak in human terms, across languages and devices. It gives people control over the information they need to participate in civic life — and it does so without gamification, AI-splaining, or emotional manipulation.

It is also a testbed: a real-world experiment in constrained AI design. By refusing to maximize engagement or output, it instead maximizes trust.

“This is not GPT with immigration data. This is a framework for responsible digital infrastructure.”

📩 For partnerships, documentation, or evaluation requests: contact@openlifestreet.com